🔗 Share this article

It's surprising, yet we're nearly at the Nintendo Switch 2's six-month anniversary. When Metroid Prime 4: Beyond releases on the fourth of December, we'll be able to give the console a comprehensive evaluation based on its impressive roster of exclusive launch window games. Major titles like Donkey Kong Bananza will headline that check-in, yet it's Nintendo's two most recent games, the Pokémon Legends installment and now the Hyrule Warriors sequel, that have enabled the successor conquer a key challenge in its opening six months: the tech exam.

Addressing Hardware Worries

Prior to Nintendo publicly unveiled the successor system, the primary worry from users about the then-theoretical console was concerning hardware. In terms of hardware, Nintendo has lagged behind PlayStation and Xbox over the last few console generations. This situation began to show in the Switch's final years. The expectation was that a successor would bring consistent frame rates, better graphics, and industry-standard features like 4K. That's precisely what arrived when the device was released in June. That's what its technical details suggested, anyway. To really determine if the Switch 2 is an enhancement, it was necessary to observe some key games performing on the hardware. We've finally gotten that over the last two weeks, and the assessment is favorable.

The Pokémon Title as an Initial Challenge

The first significant examination was October's Pokémon Legends: Z-A. The Pokémon series had some infamous tech struggles on the first Switch, with games like Scarlet and Violet debuting in highly problematic conditions. The console itself wasn't solely responsible for that; the underlying technology driving the developer's games was aged and getting stretched beyond its capabilities in the franchise's move to open-world. Legends: Z-A would be a bigger examination for its developer than anything else, but we could still learn we'd be able to glean from the visual presentation and performance on Switch 2.

Despite the release's restricted visual fidelity has initiated conversations about Game Freak's technical capabilities, there's no denying that the latest installment is not at all like the performance mess of its preceding game, the previous Legends game. It runs at a consistent 60 fps on Switch 2, while the original console tops out at 30 fps. Pop-in is still present, and there are various fuzzy textures if you examine carefully, but you won't hit anything resembling the moment in Arceus where you initially fly and observe the entire ground below become a rough, low-poly terrain. It's enough to earn the Switch 2 a satisfactory rating, but with caveats given that Game Freak has its own problems that worsen limited hardware.

Age of Imprisonment as a More Demanding Hardware Challenge

Currently available is a tougher hardware challenge, though, due to the new Hyrule Warriors, released November 6. This Zelda derivative challenges the upgraded system thanks to its hack-and-slash gameplay, which has players facing off against a literal army of monsters at all times. The series' previous game, the previous Hyrule Warriors, had issues on the original Switch as the console couldn't keep up with its fast-paced action and numerous on-screen elements. It regularly decreased below its target 30fps and gave the impression that you were overwhelming the system when going too hard in battle.

Fortunately is that it too succeeds the hardware challenge. I've been putting the title extensively during the past month, playing every single mission included. Throughout this testing, it's clear that it achieves a more stable framerate relative to its predecessor, actually hitting its 60 frames target with better regularity. It sometimes drops in the most intense combat, but There were no instances of any time when it becomes a slideshow as the performance struggles. Part of that could be because of the fact that its compact stages are designed to avoid too many enemies on the display simultaneously.

Notable Limitations and Overall Evaluation

Present are foreseeable trade-offs. Primarily, cooperative multiplayer sees performance taking a substantial reduction around 30 frames. Moreover the initial Nintendo-developed title where there's a clear a noticeable variation between my old OLED display and the new LCD display, with notably in story sequences looking faded.

However generally, the new game is a dramatic improvement compared to its previous installment, similar to Pokémon Legends: Z-A is to Arceus. If you need evidence that the new console is delivering on its performance claims, although with certain reservations remaining, both games provide a clear example of how Nintendo's latest is markedly enhancing titles that performed poorly on older technology.